Tag Archives: love

Myths: Women want love and affection part 1

MYTH: Women want love and affection. Women want to be treated well. If you treat a woman well, she’ll treat you well.

TRUTH: Young women want whatever other young women want. They’re herd creatures. If you lavish a woman with love and affection she’ll think you’re doing it because nobody else wants you (which may be true) and she’ll dump you. In fact, if you do anything that betrays that you’re a loser that other women won’t touch, she’ll dump you. Why? Because she wants to impress her friends with what a great catch she’s made, and if she thinks that they wouldn’t want you, then she doesn’t want you either.

There are only three exceptions to this rule. The first exception is ‘, otherwise known as “witches, bitches, and crazy ladies.” They’ll stay with you because nobody else wants them, or because you’re the only one who put up with their abuse. The second exception is women who like to “fix men up”: those women who like to take “broken” men and turn them into the man they want. These women are single because a mature man will recognize that these women don’t want him… they want to turn him into someone else. The third exception is that once in a long time you meet a woman who isn’t psycho, still wants to stay with you when she finds out that you’re not super stud, and doesn’t want to change you into someone else. This is the one you marry.

Incoming search terms:

Universal Laws That Govern Relationships

Tuming Lee Relationship Coach PretoriaRelationships just like life do not occur in a vacuum, the laws of nature cannot affect them. The same way, the law of gravity would cause an object to drop from a dizzy height; a similar force can cause this gravity effect to happen in any relationship at any stage if not identified early and managed properly. It is imperative for you to learn that nothing happens in isolation and this one truth you must know in order to break bad relationship habits and to stop history from repeating itself. In this article I will be discussing five laws of nature that guide the direction in which your relationship will go and will also be imparting ways in which you can manage these laws thereby effectively managing the fate of your relationships.

1. Law of Fear

Everybody knows this law and keeps referring to it but very few people know its properties and manifestation forms. Florence Scovel-Shin, the author of “The game of life and how to play it”, defines fear as inverted faith or faith turned upside down. I love this definition of fear because it clearly spells out that when you are being fearful in a relationship, it means you are being faithless. Isn’t it awkward, that the majority of people who are faithless expect their relationship to make a turn for the better, unaware of this universal contradiction which is the root cause of all strain in the relationship?
The law of attraction says that what you fear, you attract so guard your actions in a relationship and start labelling them as either fearful or faithful. If they are fearful, loose them and learn innovative ways to express negative emotions in a positive way. Your emotions may be justified by your fear is not.

Read more »

Incoming search terms:

Osho on Love, Freedom and Aloneness

Love, Freedom & Aloneness by Osho Rajneesh
A long time ago I read a book by the Indian mystic Osho: Love, Freedom & Aloneness. This is one of those rare gems that explains and perhaps introduces you to the authentic love that is sorely missing from life. The taboo that is sex, the misunderstandings about love, and the freedom you never have when you try to posses or control the others in your relationships. Give it all up and you may find the difference between loneliness and aloneness.

There is a story in the book that is profound for me: A man and woman meet and fall in love. The woman is wealth and owns a great land through inheritance. The man wants to marry her. She says on one condition: You must love on the other side of the land where I will build you your own house. And if we meet in at the lake maybe I will invite you over or you can invite me over. And if we meet in the field maybe I will talk to you and you will talk to me. The man thought about this and decided he cannot marry the woman under these conditions

Anyway I’m paraphrasing the story as I cannot find the exact page on the book right now. There was something that struck a cord with me and whenever I have tried to explain this to women I’m dating they rarely get it. There is so much brainwashing I can see in the world when it comes to relationships and dating. How needy the man or the woman has become. And what is left? Almost nothing. An emptiness that is more a heavy burden than the elusive lightness of love.

Anyway here’s a short video with Osho talking about Love and Hate: Two sides of the same coin:

Women want a good provider who listens

WHAT DO WOMEN want? A pair of sociology professors at the University of Virginia think they know: a sensitive guy with healthy pay check.

Even women who might describe themselves as feminists report being happier in marriages where the husbands earns the lion’s share of income, as long as he is engaged in the emotional life of the marriage, according to the study by W. Bradford Wilcox and Steven Nock.

In a report titled “What’s Love Got to Do With It: Equality, Equity, Commitment and Women’s Marital Quality,” published in the March issue of the journal Social Forces, the two researchers set conventional wisdom on its ear.

For example: The emotional engagement of her husband, not the division of housework and paid work, is the most important determinant of a woman’s marital happiness.

“Wives are much more concerned with whether their husband lends an attentive ear to their concerns and aspirations than whether their husband does half the cooking and cleaning,” said Wilcox, after poring over interviews with 5,000 couples in the National Survey of Families and Households.

The researchers found that women are happiest in their marriages when their husbands earn 68 percent or more of the couple’s income.

Also, women who share with their husbands a strong commitment to lifelong marriage are more likely to report that they are happy in their marriages.

And happy wives do not require a 50-50 division of chores. An unequal division of housework is still considered “fair” by these women, as long as they perceive their husbands as a good provider.

“Conventional and academic wisdom now suggests that the ‘best’ marriages are unions of equals,” said Nock. “Our work suggests that the reality is more complicated.

“Wives are surely sensitive to imbalances in routine tasks and efforts, as almost all research shows.

“However, we find that they are more concerned with their husband’s investments in the emotional content of the marriage.”

While it may be surprising that women are not as adamant about equal pay and equal chores as we might have thought – especially given the fact that housework is so often mentioned as a sore spot in even the happiest marriages – this study makes more sense than it does news.

Why wouldn’t a woman be happier with a good provider, considering his salary may make it possible for her to stay home with the kids, work part time or do meaningful work that might not pay well? It is also possible, as the researchers point out, that an unhappy wife may be working harder because she fears for the future of the marriage.

Why wouldn’t a woman who believes she and her husband share a commitment to lifelong marriage report herself to be happier than the woman who believes she and her husband will only be together for as long as love lasts? Certainly the first woman is going to feel more secure, at the very least.

And it is no surprise to me his hefty paycheck is cold comfort if the guy is deaf to the language of the heart.

I am also not surprised to learn that the happiest marriages may be those that are organized along traditional gender lines. He cuts the grass and carves the turkey, she plants the flowers and cooks the turkey. He deposits his paycheck and she fills the larder. He makes pancakes on Saturday morning, and she cooks every other meal.

Is that equal? The researchers use the word “equitable,” meaning “the experience of fairness and justness.” As long as he stays tuned in to her and the kids, she can be happy with a slightly unbalanced scale.

But the importance of his affection and concern in making a marriage happy means that women have not relented on their demand that he be “present in the marriage.” We are still not willing to put up with a lump in front of the TV, the way our mothers did.

In a way, this research may give the lie to the conventional wisdom that sex starts in the kitchen – with him pitching in.

It looks as if marriages are happier if he invites her for a walk after dinner.

Do that, and she won’t mind so much if you never get around to loading the dishwasher.

From the Baltimore Sun